拍品 59
  • 59

盧齊歐‧封塔納 | 《空間概念,等待》

估價
800,000 - 1,200,000 GBP
Log in to view results
招標截止

描述

  • 盧齊歐·封塔納
  • 《空間概念,等待》
  • 款識:藝術家簽名、書題目並題款Il ciliegio in fiore è una meraviglia!!(背面)
  • 水彩畫布
  • 65.1 x 54.2公分,25 5/8 x 21 3/8 英寸
  • 1966年作

來源

塞納托雷畫廊,斯圖加特
克特雷爾藝術,慕尼黑,「現代藝術I」,1993年11月29日,拍品編號104
私人收藏,米蘭
現藏家購自上述收藏

出版

恩里科‧克里斯波爾蒂,《盧齊歐‧封塔納:雕塑、繪畫及裝置作品總錄》,第II冊,米蘭,2006年,CCLVIII頁,載彩圖,848頁,品號66 T 138,載圖

Condition

null
我們很高興為您提供上述拍品狀況報告。由於敝公司非專業修復人員,在此敦促您向其他專業修復人員索取諮詢,以獲得更詳盡、專業之報告。

準買家應該檢查每款拍品以確認其狀況,蘇富比所作的任何陳述均為專業主觀看法而非事實陳述。準買家應參考有關該拍賣的重要通知(見圖錄)。

雖然本狀況報告或有針對某拍品之討論,但所有拍賣品均根據印於圖錄內之業務規則以拍賣時狀況出售。

拍品資料及來源

Enticing the viewer to look beyond the two dimensional canvas ground, Concetto Spaziale, Attese stands at the pinnacle of Fontana’s most revered and instantly recognisable body of work, the tagli. Abolishing the boundary between painting and sculpture, Fontana’s tagli (cuts) are an eloquent and timeless expression of the artist’s Spatialist project, which contended traditional distinctions of space and time and demarcated the possibilities of a fourth dimension. Indeed, Fontana’s liberation of the canvas from the constraints of two-dimensionality was as radical as Pollock’s dramatic handling of pigment; a vigorous and yet distinctly measured artistic expression that beautifully balanced spontaneity and control and dramatically ruptured the centuries-old paradigm of painting on canvas. In Concetto Spaziale, Attese three dark slashes playfully dance across a pristine white surface. In a spectacular interplay of light and dark, the eloquent choreography of cuts achieves a supreme vitality and elegance that appears neither laboriously embellished nor casually unplanned.

It is in this striking contrast between the white of the surface and the darkness of the void, that the tagli reach the height of their expression; the aggressive vigour of the cuts appears in a calmingly pristine no-mans-land, unhinged from conventions of time and space. The choice of white is by no means an eschewal of colour, for in his earlier works Fontana used a plain unpainted canvas ground. Indeed, Fontana explained that he chose white because it is the “purest, least complicated, most understandable colour", that which most immediately struck the note of "pure simplicity", "pure philosophy", "spatial philosophy", and "cosmic philosophy" to which Fontana more than ever aspired during the last years of his life (Lucio Fontana cited in: Enrico Crispolti, Ed., Lucio Fontana, Catalogue Raisonné des Peintures et Environments Spatiaux, Vol. I, Brussels 1974, p. 137). This is perhaps why Fontana chose to only use the combination of white ground and black slash in his installation for the XXXIII Venice Biennale in 1966, for which he won the Grand Prize for painting. Furthermore, it was the extra-dimensionality of these white tagli that Yves Klein whole-heartedly embraced in his exhibition at the Iris Clert Gallery in April 1958. Resonating with Fontana's minimalist language, Klein created an evacuated space, perfectly white in homage to the void.

The deliberate and contemplative use of white has significant connotations beyond its calming purity. As Fontana declared in his Manifesto Blanco (White Manifesto) in 1946 and his five formative Spatialist Manifestos – created between 1946 and 1952 – he believed that art should embrace science and technology. Indeed, the present work was created four years after Yuri Gagarin journeyed into space and four years before Neil Armstrong would first set foot on the moon. Therefore, this whiteness is emblematic of the synthetic, smoothed surfaces indicative of such new technologies, which were quite literally transporting humans into an infinite and weightless space.

Fontana explained that "The discovery of the Cosmos is that of a new dimension, it is the Infinite: thus I pierce this canvas, which is the basis of all arts and I have created an infinite dimension, an x which for me is the basis for all Contemporary Art" (Lucio Fontana cited in: Exh. Cat., Venice, Peggy Guggenheim Collection (and travelling), Lucio Fontana: Venice/New York, 2006, p. 19). At a time when space travel was looking less like science fiction and more like a tangible reality, the present work finds a means to enter the realm of the immaterial; not so much to define space as to re-define it, to open it up to a boundless array of possibilities. This work has the effect of marking an event, as it crosses the frontier towards a blinding conceptual and aesthetic point of no return: it collapses past, present and future within the slender abyss of each cut.