- 36
魯道夫·斯丁格爾
描述
- Rudolf Stingel
- 《無題》
- 款識:藝術家簽名並紀年2004(背面)
- 油彩、瓷漆畫布
- 240 x 194 公分;94 1/2 x 76 3/8 英寸
來源
Acquired from the above by the present owner in 2007
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
拍品資料及來源
Roberta Smith, 'Making Their Mark', The New York Times, 13 October 2007, online.
Physically enveloping in its monumental scale, the shimmering gold surface of Untitled is both visually appealing and psychologically overwhelming, drawing the viewer into its luminous interplay between positive and negative space. The present work is one of the most striking expressions of Rudolf Stingel’s highly coveted series of wallpaper works, first exhibited at the artist’s earliest solo show at Sadie Coles HQ, London. For the exhibition, Stingel created six highly decorative gold paintings, half with an ornate floral baroque motif, the other half replicating the star pattern of an Italian wallpaper from the 1950s, as in Untitled. As noted by Chrissie Iles, curator of Stingel’s acclaimed 2007 retrospective held at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York: “In Rudolf Stingel’s work, the parameters of painting and architecture are turned inside out. The traditional qualities of painting… pictorialism, flatness, illusion, composition, and autonomy… become corrupted by a new symbolic framework in which painting metamorphoses” (Chrissie Iles, ‘Surface Tension,’ in: Exh. Cat., Chicago, Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (and travelling), Rudolf Stingel, 2007, p. 23).
Melding ornamentation with a strict sense of geometrically guided repetition, Untitled is an attractive testimony to the artist’s profound expansion of the definition of painting. Upon entering the New York art world in 1987, Stingel eschewed the dominant reactionary minimalist and neo-expressionist tendencies, pioneering a process-oriented approach to painting through the creation of his lustrous silver monochromes. In 1989, the artist released his seminal Instructions: a limited edition art book that outlined the complex method by which his iconic enamel works could be replicated. Codifying his technique with a democratic release into the public sphere, Stingel’s critique demystified studio processes and subverted notions of authorial genius in favour of a sense of industrial manufacture and mechanised labour akin to Warhol’s Factory. Created by applying paint through a fine and detailed stencil, Untitled extends Stingel’s pioneering industrialised processes and rigorously critical approach to painting. By outsourcing authorship of his work, in a sense, Stingel achieves what seminal art historian Yve Alain-Bois describes as the internalisation of some of the features and processes of the very technology threatening painting, by mechanising his own body at work, a condition that the post-Impressionist Georges Seurat was the first painter to recognise.
With a deadpan insistence on the materiality and abstract presence of surface, the trajectory of Stingel’s painting, from the silver monochromes to the present work, recalls the conceptually-girded instructional paintings of Yoko Ono, or the wall drawings of Sol LeWitt. The formal beauty of Untitled, further, represents a turning point in the artist’s prolific career, in which Stingel embraced decoration, texture and tactility to create a heightened sensorial environment in the exhibition space, and in so doing destabilised the accepted hierarchy between a work and its context. As the notable curator Francesco Bonami attests, “by disrupting painting’s assumption of material, process, and placement, Stingel not only bursts open the conventions of painting, but creates unique ways of thinking about the medium and its reception” (Francesco Bonami quoted in: ibid., p. 10).