清十八 / 十九世紀 瓷胎仿鐵釉清供圖鼻煙壺

Robert Hall，倫敦，1990年

Robert Hall，《Chinese Snuff Bottles III》，倫敦，1990年，編號71
Lindsey Hall，〈Trompe L'Oeil and Chinese Snuff Bottles - Part Two: An Examination of Porcelain Imitations〉，《國際中國鼻煙壺協會學術期刊》，1998年秋，頁19，圖60
Hugh Moss、Victor Graham 及曾嘉寶，《A Treasury of Chinese Snuff
Bottles: The Mary and George Bloch Collection》，卷6，香港，2007年，編號1220

The overall condition is excellent.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

One of the unusual variants on the theme of moulded porcelain bottles from the mid-Qing period is a small group of artefacts that appear to imitate metal, usually iron, but sometimes gilt metal. The iron-like pigment here is neither a typical glaze nor a typical enamel; it is a very thin layer of brown with a tiny fish-roe pattern of darker, slightly raised circles all over it, uncannily resembling a piece of rusted iron that has been buffed. Whatever the precise technique involved, it appears to have oxidized in the kiln, giving a crystalline, rusty appearance to the surface.

It is also a very thin covering, despite the minutely stippled surface, and allows for quite fine detail to show through, more so than with, say, a turquoise-blue enamel or a white glaze. The thinness of the ‘glaze’ encouraged some fairly detailed designs for this rare group of wares.

Here is one of the most appealing, with its group of auspicious scholarly trappings. Its precise dating, however, remains uncertain. The mask handles, with their dog-like faces with floppy ears and small rings, are typical of the late-Qianlong period, but others with similar iron-like colouring have subjects that suggest they may be later. It is possible that the type was developed in the Jiaqing but continued in use into the mid-nineteenth century, when fake Qianlong marks began to be used on this type of ware. One is inclined to believe that this exceptional version is from the earlier output, although a little leeway is left just in case.