- 20
元 白釉飛雁紋扁壺
描述
- Ceramics
Condition
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.
拍品資料及來源
The incised decoration on the present piece would seem to argue that it was more suitable for a scholar's studio than travel. The symbolic significance of wild geese, particularly geese in flight, took on specific meaning during the Yuan dynasty. Earlier Song dynasty depictions of geese focused on their reliability and orderliness as observed during predictable migratory patterns. However during the Yuan dynasty, the nomadic roots of the culture preferred to view the wild bird as a symbol of unhindered freedom, the ability to pursue one's dreams and was understood as a corollary to the life of the scholar whose imagination soared in search of inspiration. For further discussion on this iconography see Hou-mei Sung, Decoded Messages, The Symbolic Language of Chinese Animal Painting, Cincinnati Art Museum, 2009, pp. 61-80.
A yi with the same composition of a wild goose in flight holding a sprig but painted in underglaze red, from the George de Menasce collection, was included in the exhibition Mostra d’Arte Cinese/Exhibition of Chinese Art, Palazzo Ducale, Venice, 1954, cat. no. 594, and sold at Anderson Galleries, New York, 24th/25th January 1930, lot 383, and again in our London rooms 14th December 1976, lot 106. Another yi with the flying goose in white on a blue ground, formerly part of the Alfred Clark Collection and sold in our London rooms 24th March 1953 is illustrated in Sherman E. Lee and Wai Kam Ho, Chinese Art under the Mongols; The Yuan Dynasty, Cleveland Museum of Art, 1968, no. 158 and in the same publication is Qingbai yuhuchunping with the same subject matter applied rather than incised onto the body, ibid, no. 112.
A flask of the same form and size from the Longquan kilns and dated to the Yuan dynasty is illustrated in Royal Ontario Museum: The T.T. Tsui Galleries of Chinese Art, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, 1996, no. 98. Another example of the same form and size but black and russet-glazed and with applied 'rope' decoration from the Schatzman Collection is illustrated in Dark Jewels, Chinese Black and Brown Ceramics from the Schatzman Collection, Ackland Art Museum, 2002, no. 68 where the author suggests that during Yuan dynasty Mongolians appreciated the flask form as a reference to their nomadic roots and that the leather, metal and perhaps some ceramic versions were used to serve koumiss.