- 1176
清道光 纏絲棕白料鼻煙壺
描述
出版
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
拍品資料及來源
Whatever the terminological doubts raised by the documentary record, a cup made in a fashion similar to what we see in this snuff bottle is found in the Mrs Barney Dagan Collection (Brown and Rabiner 1990, p. 94. no. 61). A closer parallel is provided by another snuff bottle, and it is one that helps us to date the present example with greater accuracy (Snuff Bottles of the Ch’ing Dynasty 1978, p. 74, no. 84; also in JICSBS, Summer 1993, p. 15, fig. 44). Of identical material, with white threads spread throughout a transparent amber-brown matrix, it must have been made by the same workshop, probably during the same period. It bears the studio name Shende tang 慎德堂 (Hall for Care in the Cultivation of Virtue’), which was the Daoguang emperor’s personal residence in the Yuanming yuan (see Sale 2, lot 90 and Sale 6, lot 195 for porcelain bottles with this mark). The mark on the snuff bottle is convincing, and one may assume that the bottle was made between 1831, when the Shende tang was completed, and 1850, when the emperor died.
Although this snuff bottle was almost certainly blown into a mould, much of its unusual shape seems to have been achieved by the lapidary’s efforts. The ridge running around the shoulder would probably not have been blown but carved by the lapidary; the interior bubble of air is in no way affected by this ridge, suggesting it was not on any original mould.
Other examples of this sort of glass are known (Christie’sHong Kong, 4th November 1996, lot 639 and Lawrence 1996, no. 108), while others of similar form but different colours are in Hanhai Beijing, 24th October 1996, lot 65, a white version, and Sotheby’s New York, 1st December 1992, lot 433, an unusually well-finished ruby-red version.