DAVID HOCKNEY | The Splash

Landau-Alan Gallery, New York
Galerie Renée Ziegler, Zurich
Hans-Edmund Siemers, Hamburg
Sotheby’s, London, 5 July 1973, Lot 20 (consigned by the above)
Kasmin Gallery, London (acquired from the above sale) 
Private Collection, London
David Geffen, Los Angeles
Private Collection, California (acquired from the above circa 1985)
Sotheby’s, London, 21 June 2006, Lot 8 (consigned by the above)
Acquired from the above sale by the present owner

New York, Landau-Alan Gallery, David Hockney: New Paintings and Drawings, March - April 1967, n.p., no. 2 (text)
Hanover, Kestner-Gesellschaft, David Hockney, May - June 1970, n.p., no. 38 
New York, William Beadleston, Inc., David Hockney in America, November - December 1983, illustrated in colour (cover), and p. 16, no. 11, illustrated in colour
Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Museum of Art; New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art; and London, Tate Gallery, David Hockney: A Retrospective, February 1988 - January 1989, p. 156, no. 35, illustrated in colour
Tokyo, Takashimaya Art Gallery; Kagawa, Marugame Genichiro-Inokuma Museum of Contemporary Art; Fukushima, Koriyama City Museum of Art; and Chiba, Chiba Sogo
Museum of Art, Hockney in California, April - August 1994, p. 57, no. 7, illustrated in colour
Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Made in California: Art, Image and Identity 1900-2000, October 2000 - March 2001, p. 201, illustrated in colour (detail)

Exh. Cat., London, The Whitechapel Art Gallery, David Hockney - Paintings, Prints and Drawings: 1960-1970, 1970, p. 62, no. 66.9 (text)
Nikos Stangos, Ed., David Hockney by David Hockney, London 1976, p. 161, no. 194, illustrated
Nikos Stangos, Ed., Pictures by David Hockney, London 1979, p. 50, illustrated in colour 
Peter Webb, Portrait of David Hockney, New York 1988, p. 83 (text)
Paul Melia and Ulrich Luckhardt, David Hockney, Munich 1994 and 2011, p. 84 (text)
Matthew Sperling, ‘Ripple Effect: The Pull of Hockney’s Pool Paintings,’ Apollo Magazine, 4 February 2017, p. 54 (text)
Martin Hammer, ‘The photographic source and artistic affinities of David Hockney’s 'A Bigger Splash'', The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 159, No. 1370, May 2017, p. 386 (text)

Colour: The colours in the catalogue illustration are fairly accurate, although they are slightly more vibrant in the original. Condition: Please refer to the department for a professional condition report.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."

David Hockney’s The Splash is undoubtedly one of the most iconic Pop art images of the Twentieth Century. In tandem with its sister painting, Tate’s A Bigger Splash, Hockney’s composition of a sun-drenched swimming pool disturbed by a torrent of cascading water is a definitive image, not only within the artist’s career and the Pop art movement at large, but also within the greater canon of art history itself. Indeed, looking beyond the Twentieth Century, there are very few artworks to have attained such a status: equally as recognisable as Edvard Munch’s The Scream, Vincent van Gogh’s Sunflowers and Claude Monet’s Waterlilies, this motif is a masterstroke of ingenuity that sits squarely in the select pantheon of true art history icons. Semiotically tied to our very understanding of what Pop art is and inextricable from an ideal of Californian living, this image is utterly ingrained within the contemporary cultural imagination. It is an irrefutably famous and undeniably rare painting of masterpiece calibre and mythic proportion. Painted in Los Angeles towards the end of 1966, The Splash is the second in a three-part sequence of variations on the very same theme. It is sandwiched between the much smaller The Little Splash (Private Collection) and Tate’s A Bigger Splash, which was created early the following year in Berkeley whilst Hockney was fulfilling a teaching post. When comparing the two, the present work’s scale of 72 by 72 inches is immersive and rivals the colossal dimensions of its sister version at Tate Britain; the compositions are almost identical, with large bands of unprimed canvas framing the clean lines and still colour fields of the central image, whilst the splash itself is rendered with equal deftness and dexterity in both canvases – the immediacy of a split-second moment is here immortalised by brushstrokes of careful application and minute articulation. The Splash and its pendent piece undoubtedly represent the apex of Hockney’s Californian fantasy which truly began following the artist’s first trip to LA in 1964. Cleansing the air of the previous decade, which had seen Abstract Expressionism gradually suffocate under its own earnestness, Hockney’s ‘Splashes’ revealed the artist’s pre-eminence as a leading light of his generation. With the present work, Hockney at once coined a visual identity for LA during the 1960s whilst absorbing and resolving the disparate concerns of Abstract Expressionism, Minimalism, and Pop art in a style that was entirely his own.

After spending time in New York, Hockney travelled to the West Coast of America for the first time during the summer of 1964. Upon arriving, he was instantly struck by the quality of light, the landscape of California, and by the ubiquity of swimming pools. “As I flew over San Bernardino and looked down and saw the swimming pools and the houses and the sun,” Hockney recalled, “I was more thrilled than I’ve ever been… I thought it was really terrific, I really enjoyed it and physically the place did have an effect on me” (David Hockney cited in: Exh. Cat., London, Whitechapel Art Gallery, David Hockney: Paintings, Prints and Drawings 1960-70, 1970, p. 11). Hockney fell under the spell of California almost immediately; the vivid and undoubtedly erotic frisson of a city in which every house seemed to have its own Bacchanalian retreat in the backyard was the hedonistic escape the young artist had so longed for back in dreary Blighty. Upon his return to London later that year, the first thing Hockney painted was Picture of a Hollywood Swimming Pool, and thus began the artist’s most important body of work and enduring subject: Southern California.

In 1966, Hockney decided to relocate more permanently to California and took up an apartment/studio near the junction of Pico and Crenshaw Boulevards in Los Angeles. It was here, between the summers of 1966 and 1967, that Hockney would paint some of his most famous works, including the present composition. During those twelve months the young artist veered away from the naive line and abstract forms redolent in his previous work and instead took up a truer approach grounded in the visual effects of light and shadow on figure and form. With works such as Peter Getting Out of Nick’s Pool (Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool), Portrait of Nick Wilder (Private Collection), and Sunbather (Museum Ludwig, Cologne) – all painted in 1966 – Hockney had arrived at a mature and accomplished style that demonstrated greater realism, visual fidelity and conceptual ingenuity, heightened by an idealised and synthetic use of colour and line. Indeed, Hockney’s Edenic vision of California has been likened to that of Gauguin’s Tahiti; as outsiders, both artists exoticized and idealised their own personal paradises. Created mid-way through this prolific burst of energy at the close of 1966, Hockney’s The Splash delivered a culmination of the themes explored in his Californian opus to date. Against a Modernist building surrounded by striking high-key colour, the absent presence of a diver, who, at an instant forever captured in paint, is submerged and masked by an explosion of displaced water, delivers a triumph of invention that throws immediacy and permanence into impossible stasis.

Since the beginning, Hockney’s creative urge has been driven by a desire to explore the intricacies and ambiguities of perception. In this regard, the swimming pools of Los Angeles presented him with a fresh challenge – that of depicting a substance in motion that is essentially transparent to the eye. It also involved another of his most-loved paradoxes: that of freezing in a still image something which is never still. He had attempted this previously in a series of ‘Shower’ paintings, as well as in several portraits of his friends in pools such as Portrait of Nick Wilder; however, with his ‘Splashes’ Hockney responded to the challenge with even greater innovation and commitment, banishing human presence altogether and replacing it with a dramatic post-dive aftershock.

The inspiration for The Splash came from the front cover of a popular technical manual, first published in 1959, on how to build swimming pools. From this image Hockney crucially derived the main tenets of his paintings’ cropped compositions; however, to cite art historian Martin Hammer, who recently wrote on the genesis of A Bigger Splash and its companion pieces, “[a] good deal was already omitted: the trees, pool furniture, complex reflections on glass and water, and above all the couple looking admiringly at their athletic offspring. In Hockney’s second version and in A Bigger Splash, the replacement of the folksy architecture with a modernist bungalow, the substitution of a pair of palm trees for the mountains and other picturesque details, and the general sense of order, serve to heighten the effect of distillation. In the absence of figures or a fully developed setting, we are left with the idea of house and pool as the collective fantasy of wealthy, sophisticated Los Angeles society” (Martin Hammer, ‘The photographic source and artistic affinities of David Hockney’s “A bigger splash”’, The Burlington Magazine, May 2017, No. 1370, Vol. 159, online). For the latter two works in the series, Hockney scaled-up his composition onto large square formats with unprimed borders – a formal device that echoes the photographic origin of his composition and underlines the artist’s abiding use of photography in creating his work. In fact, as Hammer outlines, 1965 saw the release of Polaroid’s Swinger model, the first truly inexpensive instant camera whose instantaneous square prints, echoed in the present work’s format, would later be used directly in the artist’s polaroid composites of the late 1970s and ’80s.

Against a minimalistic, almost colour-field, composition, Hockney’s undisputed and undisturbed protagonist takes centre stage: a splash of water in the form of an eruption of brushstrokes. The effect, though painstakingly rendered, is utterly spontaneous; heavy white tendrils snake against jets of foam, while specks and droplets cascade from transparent veil-like screens of plumed water. “The splash itself,” Hockney explained when remembering painting A Bigger Splash, “is painted with small brushes and little lines; it took me about two weeks to paint the splash. I loved the idea, first of all, of painting like Leonardo, all his studies of water, swirling things. And I loved the idea of painting this thing that lasts for two seconds; it takes me two weeks to paint this event that lasts for two seconds. Everyone knows a splash can’t be frozen in time, so when you see it like that in a painting it’s even more striking than in a photograph” (David Hockney cited in: Exh. Cat., London, Whitechapel Art Gallery, op. cit., p. 124). This great explosion marks the split-second vanishing act of a diver about to emerge from the pool’s cerulean depths. It is this dramatic play between tranquillity and intensity, between surface and depth, between spontaneity and calm that gives The Splash its visual punch. Moreover, in pitting compositional rigidity against an illusion of paroxysm, Hockney serves up a wry nod to Minimalism and Abstract Expressionism, most notably to the Action painting of Jackson Pollock who made splashing paint onto canvas hallowed ground during the 1950s. As outlined by Tate curator Chris Stephens, “If the abstract painter’s gesture, captured in a single ejaculation, was an embodiment of emotional and psychological immediacy and authenticity, then Hockney’s laborious rendering of a splash using a small brush over several days is surely a parodic subversion of that belief” (Chris Stephens, ‘Sunbather’ in: Exh. Cat., Tate Britain, London (and travelling), David Hockney, 2017-18, p. 67). The same parodic reading can be applied to Hockney’s treatment of Modernist buildings, whose precise regularity provides a comment on the sterile forms and compositions of contemporary Minimalist art (Ibid.). Jumping to and from conventional pedestals whilst bridging diverse disciplines at the forefront of the avant-garde, Hockney’s The Splash playfully scrutinises the formal issues of contemporary painting with unprecedented confidence and resolution.

The geometric order of the composition is almost too still, too refined and too composed, and this enhances the drama of The Splash as it erupts out of the canvas to momentarily break the graphic tension of its planar configuration. There is a suggestion too that the coherence of the rest of the surface is on the brink of collapse – trembling with a similar internal force. In California, Hockney had discovered his very own Arcadia; for him it embodied an ideal of freedom, a sexual promised land that had fuelled his imagination long before he had even arrived there. In the artist’s own words: “I was drawn towards California, which I didn’t know… because I sensed the place would excite me. No doubt it had something to do with sex” (David Hockney cited in: ibid.). The splash paintings, therefore, can be congruously read as a consummating explosion of joy and a voluptuous unleashing of pigment charged with sexual energy. Art critic Andrew Graham Dixon elucidates this point in more detail: “The subject of A Bigger Splash is both a disappearance and an immersion – the vanishing of the diver, his entry into the pool – which was surely Hockney’s way of dramatising his own feelings on having arrived in America. He too had made his getaway, had plunged into a new and delightful place. The artist does not actually show us his alter ego, the diver, revelling in the sudden silence of underwater. But he makes much of the splash that hides him from us… a flurry of excited white paint into which the painter seems to have distilled all the happiness and energy of being young, and in love, and exactly where you want to be; an ejaculation of joy” (Andrew Graham-Dixon, ‘A Bigger Splash by David Hockney’, Sunday Telegraph, 13 August 2000, online). Indeed, it was in 1966 that Hockney fell passionately in love with Peter Schlesinger, and thus, with his first great romance came an assurance and visual directness that was previously absent in his work. Akin perhaps to the extraordinary period of Francis Bacon’s career precipitated by the arrival of George Dyer – some paintings of whom feature streaks of white pigment flung across their surfaces – the intensifying effect of a new and important personal relationship invested Hockney’s work with an erotically charged and Dionysian sense of joie de vivre.

Anathema to the idyllic, almost pastiche campness of a Californian ideal that is often associated with Hockney's paintings of 1960s LA, Martin Hammer has identified a darker sense of foreboding harboured by these works. In popular culture available to Hockney at the time, swimming pool’s were already an established trope for death and destruction. For example, in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1925) and the 1950 movie Sunset Boulevard, a swimming pool sets the scene for the male lead’s death in both tales. Moreover, Hockney was newly acquainted with Christopher Isherwood, whose 1964 novel, A Single Man, tells the demise of its protagonist within a grim and newly developed, urban Los Angeles. By hinting at a bleaker reality existing beneath the superficial surface gloss of sunny California, Hockney’s splashes evince a similar attitude to Ed Ruscha’s contemporaneous picturing of LA. As Hammer outlines: “A Bigger Splash also makes for an interesting juxtaposition with Ruscha’s monumental Los Angeles County Museum on Fire (Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Washington), begun in 1965, as the Museum’s new wing opened… At a thematic level, both undercut the utopian connotations of sub-modernist Los Angeles architecture with a note of threat or transient disturbance. Hockney’s splash, with its elusive narrative, is matched by the fire afflicting the museum of Ruscha’s composition… The absence of human activity reinforces the desolate atmosphere" (Martin Hammer, op. cit.). For Hockney’s composition, the latent threat which may lie just beneath the water’s surface, poignantly reminds us that even in Arcadia, tragedy can occur (Ibid.).

Through a combination of both formal and metaphorical devices, an illusion of space and Californian life is here abstracted into an essence that is entirely unique, innovative, and utterly multifaceted. Although rooted firmly in popular culture, like much of Hockney’s work there is a powerful autobiographical narrative that emanates from its close affinity to the events of his life. Hockney’s discovery of California in 1964 signalled a watershed moment, an epiphany that finds visual expression in the handful of extraordinary paintings created between 1966 and ’67, the culmination of which is undoubtedly The Splash and its pendent picture, a work visited by thousands every day at Tate Britain.