- 325
Pompeo Girolamo Batoni
Description
- Pompeo Girolamo Batoni
- Portrait of Prince Edward Augustus, Duke of York and Albany (1739-1767)
- signed and dated on the ledge, center right: P. BATONI PINXIT ROMAE. 1764. (AE in ligature) and stamped on the reverse of the canvas: H.S.B. 121
- oil on canvas
- 137 x 99,5 cm
Provenance
Offered for sale, Christie's, London, 21st July 1944 or 1946, lot 161, where it was likely bought in and returned to the collection of the House of Hanover;
Prince Ernst August of Hanover (born 1954), Schloss Marienburg, Pattensen bei Hannover (fig. 1);
His sale, ("Property from the Royal House of Hanover"), Schloss Marienburg, Sotheby's, 6 October 2005, lot 589;
With Galleria Cesare Lampronti, Rome;
From whom acquired in 2010.
Literature
A. Clark, E.P. Bowron (ed.), Pompeo Batoni, A Complete Catalogue of his Works with an Introductory Text, London 1985, pp. 294-5, under cat. no. 273;
O. Millar, "Pompeo Batoni, A Complete Catalogue", (book review), in The Burlington Magazine, vol. 129, 1987, pp. 604-605;
M. Levey, The later Italian Pictures in the Collection of Her Majesty the Queen, London 1991, p. 10;
E.P. Bowron, P. Bjorn Kerber, Pompeo Batoni, Prince of Painters in Eighteen Century Rome, exhibition catalogue, New Haven and London 2007, pp. 42, 97, 113, 174, reproduced p. 43, fig. 39;
C.D. Dickerson III, in R.R. Brettell and C.D. Dickerson (eds.), From the Private Collections of Texas: European Art, Ancient to Modern, exhibition catalogue, Fortworth 2010, p. 190, under cat. no. 32 and note 4;
F. Petrucci, Pittura di ritratto a Roma: Il Settecento, Rome 2010, vol. I, pp. 164-165, cat. no. 4, reproduced vol. II, p. 398, fig. 80;
E.P. Bowron, Pompeo Batoni: A Complete Catalogue of His Paintings, New Haven and London 2016, vol. I, pp. 343–344, cat. no. 284.
Condition
"This lot is offered for sale subject to Sotheby's Conditions of Business, which are available on request and printed in Sotheby's sale catalogues. The independent reports contained in this document are provided for prospective bidders' information only and without warranty by Sotheby's or the Seller."
Catalogue Note
While the Duke’s visit to Italy was not politically motivated, it came shortly after the end of the Seven Years War and elicited great interest. Many prominent members of Roman society were keen to ingratiate themselves with the new Hanoverian ruling family. In a vain attempt to elude attention, the Duke of York traveled to Italy in cognito as the "Earl of Ulster", but from the time of his arrival in Genoa on 28 November 1763 to his departure on 17 August 1764, his trip was documented in regular newspaper accounts, both in Italy and at home. His sitting with Batoni may have been organized by Richard Dalton who was librarian to the Duke’s brother, King George III. Dalton travelled regularly to Italy to purchase works of art on behalf of the King and, given his knowledge of the country, would have played a key role in the coordination of the Duke’s tour.4 Edward Augustus sat for Batoni wearing the sash of the Order of the Garter and the undress uniform of a flag officer. Batoni would have had a variety of backdrops for his sitters to choose from; the Duke opted to be depicted before one of Rome’s most recognizable monuments, the Colosseum.
Cardinal Albani implored the Duke to visit Rome during his Italian sojourn and entertained him at the Villa Albani outside Porta Salaria. The Cardinal also arranged for the British painter and antiquary Thomas Jenkins to act as the Duke’s guide, or cicerone, for the duration of his trip while the art historian and archeologist Johann Joachim Winkelmann was tasked with advising him on the purchase of art.5 The Duke’s attention, however, appears to have been focused less on Italy’s rich historical and artistic offerings and more on its promise of diversion. The Duke’s reputation as a philanderer and libertine became fodder for the newspapers who relished in reporting each alleged conquest. Less than impressed by the Duke’s exploits, Winkelmann described him as “the greatest princely beast that I know, [who] does no honour to his rank and nation.”6 Winkelmann was not alone in his contempt for the Duke, as Ilaria Bignamini writes, “no eighteenth-century Grand Tourist had a worst reputation than the Duke of York both at home and abroad.”7 Horace Walpole’s account of him in a letter to Horace Mann was scathing to say the least: “a milk-white angel, white even to his eyes and eyelashes, very purblind and whose tongue runs like a fiddlestick. (…) York seems a title fated to sit on silly heads – or don’t let us talk of him; he is not worth it.”8 It is worth noting, however, that Walpole’s view of the Duke was likely tainted, as the royal is said to have “stolen a lady” from him.9 Whether or not personal retribution was a factor, Walpole certainly did everything in his power to discredit the Duke of York, propagating the opinion that his tour of Italy reflected the king’s desire to distance his free-thinking brother from the British political arena.10
Despite his reputation, the Duke of York was well received in Rome and was showered with gifts from the Pope. The Duke resolved to return to Italy three years later, according to Walpole, “intending to visit a lady at Genoa, with whom he was in love.”11 He stopped in the South of France where he was taken ill and died shortly after in Monaco, on 17 September 1767.
1. E.P. Bowron, under Literature, vol. I, pp. 340-344, cat. nos. 281-284.
2. J. Martin, “Grand Tour Journal, 1763-5. MS,” extracts published in E.P. Bowron, op. cit., vol. I, p. 341.
3. A.M. Clark, op. cit.
4. D.Goodreau, in Nathaniel Dance, 1735-1811, (exhibition catalogue), London 1977 (no page numbers).
5. E.P. Bowron, op. cit., vol. I, p. 340.
6. J.J. Winkelmann, Briefe, W. Rehm and H. Diepolder (ed.), Berlin 1952, vol. III, pp. 39-40.
7. I. Bignamini, in Grand tour: The lure of Italy in the eighteenth century, London 1996, p. 34.
8. H. Walpole, The Letters of Horace Walpole, Fourth Earl Orford, P. Cunningham (ed.), Edinburgh 1906, vol. IV, p. 480.
9. I. Bignamini, op. cit., pp. 34-35.
10. Ibid., p. 34.
11. H. Walpole, op. cit., vol. V, p. 65.