- 118
Matthäus Gundelach
Description
- Matthäus Gundelach
- The Coronation of the Virgin by the Holy Trinity
- oil on copper
Condition
"This lot is offered for sale subject to Sotheby's Conditions of Business, which are available on request and printed in Sotheby's sale catalogues. The independent reports contained in this document are provided for prospective bidders' information only and without warranty by Sotheby's or the Seller."
Catalogue Note
Gundelach was born in Hesse, the son of the painter Hans Gundelach. The young Gundelach was in Prague by his mid-twenties where he signed and dated a drawing Minerva and Ceres (1593),3 and annotated that he came from Cassel, where we might assume that he was born. It is apparent from the handful of early copies by Gundelach of works by Bartholomäus Spranger that he was a great admirer of the older Antwerp-born master, but he quickly became closely associated with Joseph Heintz, court painter for Emperor Rudolph II. It has been suggested that Gundelach was a pupil of Heintz as he completed at least one work by him, and is recorded as having copied his drawings.4 Indeed Gundelach seems to have been something of a replacement for Heintz; upon the latter’s death in 1609, Gundelach took his place as imperial Kammermaler to the Emperor, inherited his studio, married his widow Regina, and acted as guardian to Heintz’s children.
Heintz himself had painted the subject when he was commissioned to paint The Coronation of the Virgin by the Trinity, for Christoph Fugger from Augsburg, a work now in the collection of the Prince of Liechtenstein.5 The harmonious and balanced construction of Heintz’s composition, dated to between 1602 and 1614/15 by Jürgen Zimmer,6 with its glowing back-light, and imposing figures of Christ and of God, and the sweetness of spirit with which the contemplative Virgin is depicted, are all certainly features that seem to have inspired Gundelach’s own Coronation. An execution date for the present work to the same period in which Heintz produced his altarpiece, or just after, seems probable.
Zimmer wrote that Heintz’s painting follows the Roman-Bolognese tradition. While Gundelach himself is thought not to have travelled to Italy, Spranger, Heintz, and Hans van Aachen, each prominent masters at the court of Rudolf II and each significant influences on Gundelach, all spent time in Venice, Florence and Rome. Through the collaboration of these painters, and with the artistic exchange within the court of Rudolf II, the influence of those Italian masters such as Correggio, Tintoretto, Barocci and the sculptor Giambologna, became fused with the legacy of the artists of the northern Renaissance, such as Albrecht Dürer and Pieter Brueghel the Elder. This combination resulted in the unique sensual mannerism of the Prague School in the early decades of the seventeenth century, visible here in Gundelach’s Coronation. Here, the 'sweet' style of among other parts the Virgin suggests that Gundelach may have extended his teachers interest in Correggio and Barocci to include the latters Sienese followers Francesco Vanni and Ventura Salimbeni .
In about 1615 Gundelach left Prague. He is known to have been in the service of the Duke of Württemberg between 1616 and 1617, and settled in Augsburg soon after, where he became the representative of the new early Baroque style. He enjoyed an active and varied career as a painter and designer of prints until his death in 1654.
The use of a copper plate as a support is not unusual for paintings produced at this time. Smaller works were often on copper, reflecting the contemporary taste for highly detailed, almost miniaturist works, painted in jewel-like colours with a glossy smooth finish. Such paintings formed an important part of a Kunstkammer such as that created by Emperor Rudolf II.
We are grateful for Dr Jürgen Zimmer for proposing the attribution of the present lot to Matthäus Gundelach.
1. Inv. no. 2009.70.1. See M. Morgan Grasselli and A. Wheelock (eds), The McCrindle Gift, A Distinguished Collection of Drawings and Watercolours, Washington 2012, p. 43, reproduced.
2. T. DaCosta Kaufmann, The School of Prague, Painting at the Court of Rudolf II, Chicago and London 1988, p. 134.
3. DaCosta Kaufmann 1988, p. 37, reproduced fig. 30.
4. DaCosta Kaufmann 1988, p. 180.
5. Liechtenstein inventory number GE 2411. See DaCosta Kaufmann 1988, p. 192, cat. no. 7.31, reproduced.
6. J. Zimmer, ‘Joseph Heintz und die Fugger’, in Alte und Moderne Kunst, no. 25, 1980, p. 18.