- 48
Georges Braque
Description
- Georges Braque
- Verre et compotier
- signed G. Braque (lower left); signed G. Braque on the reverse
- oil and sand on canvas
- 26.5 by 65.5cm.
- 10 3/8 by 25 3/4 in.
Provenance
Galerie Beyeler, Basel
Private Collection, Europe (acquired from the above. Sold: Christie’s, London, 29th June 2000, lot 319)
Purchased at the above sale by the present owner
Exhibited
Basel, Galerie Beyeler, Georges Braque, 1968, no. 30, illustrated in colour in the catalogue
Literature
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
In the present work the various fruits and furnishings are not deconstructed and analysed as specimens as they might have been during Braque’s Cubist period, rather they are treated solely as elements of the overall composition. As Braque noted: ‘Without having striven for it, I do in fact end by changing the meaning of objects and giving them a pictorial significance which is adequate to their new life. When I paint a vase, it is not with the intention of creating a utensil capable of holding water. It is for quite another reason. Objects are recreated for a new purpose: in this case, that of playing a part in a picture. Once an object has been integrated into a picture, it accepts a new density and at the same time becomes universal. If it remains an individual object this must be due to lack of improvisation or imagination. As they give up their habitual function, so objects become united by the relationships which sprung up between them and the picture and ultimately myself!’ (quoted in Douglas Cooper, Braque, The Great Years, Chicago, 1972, p. 111).