Alexander Calder

Peter Bellew, France (gift of the artist circa 1962)
Sotheby Parke Bernet Inc., New York, May 20, 1983, Lot 441 (consigned by the above)
Private Collection, Davenport, Iowa (acquired from the above)
Sotheby's, New York, November 13, 2012, Lot 15 (consigned by the above)
Private Collection, Europe (acquired from the above)
Acquired by the present owner from the above

Iowa City, University of Iowa Museum of Art, Extended Loan, 1984 - 2010
Des Moines, Des Moines Art Center, Iowa Collects, April - July 1985
Davenport, Iowa, Figge Art Museum, Extended Loan, April 2010 - March 2011

University of Iowa, Building a Masterpiece, Iowa City, 2009, p. 30, illustrated

This sculpture is in excellent condition. The sculpture was repainted circa 2012 under the supervision of the Calder Foundation. There are some faint handling marks located primarily along the edge of the vertical "neck" of the work and along the upper arch and inner lower bend of the right "leg" as illustrated in the catalogue.
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.

Untitled, a stunning early sculpture of Alexander Calder’s formidable half-century-long career, is abundantly demonstrative of the artist’s unrivaled aptitude for envisioning and realizing abstraction in its three-dimensional form. Executed around 1938, the year Calder returned to New York after a yearlong sojourn in Europe, Untitled is a powerful testament to the artist’s indelible legacy and is as striking and revelatory today as it surely was in the year of its execution. Foremost among modernist masters, Calder’s highly idiosyncratic artistic practice is based upon principles of force and balance -- the arcing black sheets of metal that comprise the present work marry perfectly into a sinuous whole, imbuing Untitled with a breathtaking sense of simultaneous equilibrium and movement that is quintessential Calder. Moreover, this sculpture marks a turning point of abundant innovation in the artist’s growing lexicon of three-dimensional invention, unrivaled amongst twentieth-century sculptors. In conjunction with Devil Fish of 1937, Untitled is the illustrious antecedent to Calder’s ambitious monumental technical practice, which arrived at its critical apex in the artist’s first monumental stabile work, Black Beast of 1940.  

Untitled transmits a dynamic torsion that wholly defies the work’s stationary nature. As each leg seems to simultaneously curve outward and sway inward, the upper pointed appendages reach in opposite directions, upwards toward the sky and downwards toward the ground. This contrapuntal form is nearly figurative in its coiling choreography; indeed, the vivacious momentum of Untitled calls to mind Calder’s beloved swaying “mobiles.” Movement played a vital role in Calder’s corpus from the artist’s earliest days; in October 1930, in what is now a famous visit he made to Piet Mondrian’s studio, where he was impressed by the environment, Calder became immediately and ineluctably enraptured with creating abstract compositions of moving elements. The kinetic mobiles, encouraged to move with the air’s currents, are celebrated for resembling drawings wrenched from the flat surface of the page and set free to float through the natural currents of their environment. The disparity between the mobile works and Calder’s standing sculptures prompted Jean Arp to famously dub the latter “stabiles,” a term that has come to encompass all of Calder’s still work, including the present sculpture. Though the distinction between these two bodies of work is well accepted, gallerist Marc Glimcher explained, “While some might consider the mobiles to be the ultimate expression of Calder’s use of ‘drawing in space,’ it is, in fact with the stabiles that Calder takes that final step.” Glimcher further notes that just as the artist’s wire sculptures and mobiles “borrow the fundamental drawing element of line and introduce it into the ‘real world,’ the [stabile] relies on the equally familiar element of drawing, the plane.” (Exh. Cat., New York, Pace Wildenstein, Calder: From Model to Monument, 2006, p. 5)

Calder is pictured in his New York studio beside an intact yet unpainted Devil Fish in a remarkable 1936 photograph by Herbert Matter. The photographer captures Calder’s process, as the artist’s tool marks are visible upon the raw metal. Successive denotations emphasize the sculpture’s spectacular arcs, once more expounding upon this formative moment in Calder’s career - in the late 1930s he not only mastered three-dimensional abstraction in metal, but he also invented the method of construction for his future monumental works. With both Devil Fish and Untitled, we experience the joyous creativity of a master of fluid form and bold graphics, eloquently described by Marla Prather in an essay on the aesthetic evolution of Calder’s work from 1937-1945: “The upright orientation of Calder’s freestanding sculpture and the beautifully curving silhouettes of its cut and bent forms underscore the new organic strain in Calder’s art, one that alludes to forms in the natural world without being tied specifically to any one of them.” (Exh. Cat., Washington, D. C., National Gallery of Art, Alexander Calder, 1898-1976, 1998, p. 136)  Of the evolution of his methods, Glimcher wrote, “In Calder’s hands these technologies transformed art, just as it had transformed the cities that the monumental stabiles would soon inhabit. Among all the great innovations by all the great artists of the first half of the century, this may well have been the one that made abstraction truly modern.” (Op. Cit., p. 8)