Lot 435
  • 435

William Kentridge

Estimate
150,000 - 200,000 USD
Log in to view results
bidding is closed

Description

  • William Kentridge
  • Sleeping on Glass
  • video installation, chest of drawers and two mirrors
  • Dimensions Variable
  • Executed in 1999, this work is number 3 from an edition of 3.

Provenance

Stephen Friedman Gallery, London
Acquired by the present owner from the above

Exhibited

South African National Gallery; Washington D.C., Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden; Contemporary Arts Museum Houston; Los Angeles County Museum of Art; New York, New Museum of Contemporary Art; Lakeworth, Museum of Contemporary Art, William Kentridge, June 2001 - March 2003, pp. 134-135 and 154 (another example exhibited)

Condition

This work is in very good and sound condition overall. The electronic and media components are in good working order. There is evidence of light wear and handling to the chest and drawers, most notably on the top of the dresser where there are two 1 inch scratches, one of which is 4 3/4 inches from the right edge and the other 1 inch from the back edge. There are scattered unobtrusive accretions on the mirror that is used to reflect the film on to the projector screen. Adhesive residue used to secure the screen is visible, but only if the dresser is viewed from behind.
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.

Catalogue Note

Sleeping on Glass perfectly synthesizes the diverse artistic background and conceptual fascinations of William Kentridge, channeling these influences into one of the artist’s strongest pieces to date. Kentridge’s multidimensional resume includes not only a robust artistic foundation in printmaking and drawing but also a degree in Politics and African Studies from the University of the Witwatersrand and years of studying mime and theatre at the L'École Internationale de Théâtre Jacques Lecoq in Paris. In pieces such as Sleeping on Glass, we see how the artist’s own complex biography has lent itself to the creation of an equally complex and sophisticated body of work.  

Looking beyond the common emphasis on social commentary, Kentridge's art can be broadly characterized as interplay between fantasy and realism. With this framing in mind, his work has at times been likened to a Contemporary reflection on Dada and Surrealism. In the present work, by displaying an animated film within the context of a larger physical installation, Kentridge effectively blurs the separation between the real or live and the displayed or performed. With this staging and the inclusion of found objects, he highlights the participatory quality of the act of viewing, a theme central to this artist’s oeuvre.

Kentridge has always held a keen fascination with mechanisms of viewing and the interactive act of seeing. Curator Lilian Tone has elaborated on this focus noting, "He provokes a reflection on the process of seeing; constantly pointing to a world whose meaning must be constructed by each of us through our sense of sight." (Lilian Tone, William Kentridge: Fortuna, London, 2013)

A mirror perhaps is the ultimate manifestation of these concepts in their most basic form. Kentridge masterfully employs this object as a potent symbol in this poetic installation. Within his film, the metaphor of mirror imagery is emphasized through the compositional format of the open face of a book. Frequently, his drawn pages appear like mirror images with only subtle differences such as a shift in the text from “PANIC” to “PICNIC”. These poetic subtleties peak the viewer’s awareness and prompt a deeply sensitive reading of this important work.