- 187
Giambattista Tiepolo
Estimate
30,000 - 40,000 GBP
Log in to view results
bidding is closed
Description
- Giovanni Battista Tiepolo
- Two angels in flight
- oil on canvas, a fragment
Provenance
Private collection, Paris;
With Michelangelo Gallery, Brescia;
From whom acquired by the present owner.
With Michelangelo Gallery, Brescia;
From whom acquired by the present owner.
Literature
A. Morassi, A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings of G.B. Tiepolo, Aylesbury 1962, p. 42, reproduced fig. 225 (with incorrect measurements);
A. Pallucchini, L'opera completa di Giambattista Tiepolo, Milan 1968, p. 91, cat. no. 46, reproduced;
E. Martini, La pittura del Settecento veneto, Maniago 1982, p. 510;
M. Gemin and F. Pedrocco, Giambattista Tiepolo, i dipinti, Venice 1993, p. 242, cat. no. 60, reproduced;
F. Pedrocco, Giambattista Tiepolo, The Complete Paintings, New York 2002, p. 205, cat. no. 45, reproduced.
A. Pallucchini, L'opera completa di Giambattista Tiepolo, Milan 1968, p. 91, cat. no. 46, reproduced;
E. Martini, La pittura del Settecento veneto, Maniago 1982, p. 510;
M. Gemin and F. Pedrocco, Giambattista Tiepolo, i dipinti, Venice 1993, p. 242, cat. no. 60, reproduced;
F. Pedrocco, Giambattista Tiepolo, The Complete Paintings, New York 2002, p. 205, cat. no. 45, reproduced.
Condition
The fragmentary canvas has a recent and firm relining which has not overly flattened the paint surface. It should be noted that the lower right corner of the canvas has been made up by a later addition. The paint surface is under a slightly discoloured varnish but appear to the naked eye in good condition. Inspection under UV light reveals some restored frame abrasion along the edges and some retouching in and around the faces and the wings. Large passages are untouched.
Offered in a carved and gilt wooden frame in good condition.
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
Extensively published by numerous Tiepolo scholars, all of whom have agreed on this work's autograph status, the dating of this fragmentary canvas has, however, caused some disagreement. Morassi, the first scholar to publish the painting, dated it to 1720-25, around the same time as Tiepolo's frescoes in the Cappella del Sacramento in the cathedral in Udine.1 Shortly thereafter Pallucchini proposed a slightly later dating of 1726, while Martini and later Pedrocco have dated the work to 1722, comparing it stylistically to the monumental Madonna del Carmel with Saints in Brera, Milan.2
1. See Gemin and Pedrocco, under Literature, p. 250, cat. nos. 75-77, reproduced.
2. Idem, p. 241, cat. no. 59, reproduced.
1. See Gemin and Pedrocco, under Literature, p. 250, cat. nos. 75-77, reproduced.
2. Idem, p. 241, cat. no. 59, reproduced.