- 118
Lee Krasner
描述
- Lee Krasner
- Dichotomy
- oil on canvas
- 55 1/2 by 48 1/8 in. 141 by 122.2 cm.
- Executed in 1963.
來源
Robert Miller Gallery, New York
Acquired by the present owner from the above in October 1984
展覽
Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama, University Art Gallery, Paintings by Lee Krasner, February - March 1967, cat. no. 10
出版
Condition
In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective qualified opinion.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING CONDITION OF A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF SALE PRINTED IN THE CATALOGUE.
拍品資料及來源
In Dichotomy, Krasner offers a lyrical expression of powerful creative forces. The curvilinear and rounded shapes evolve intuitively, sometimes creating figure 8's or infinity signs. The dynamic play between the foreground and background fills the entire canvas creating a rhythmic dance of paint. There is no beginning and no end, rather a cosmic expanse of symbols that hint at an infinite variety of meanings and interpretation. The rich maroon red pigments of the present work mix into a deep rose and spread smoothly yet inconsistently across the canvas. The vivacious movement and use of raw canvas peeking through certain areas enhance the appearance of movement and depth. The composition is filled with dynamic interwoven brushwork, grand-sweeping arcs that redirect volumes in biomorphic, expressionist and post-cubist manners in their suggestion of shapes and pictorial depth.
Krasner's paint application seems meditative in its use of monochromatic tones, and yet the all-over layers of paint reveal the artist's primal, cathartic impulse – quite a departure from her longtime practice of methodically reworking a canvas. Perhaps the figurative meaning of the title, Dichotomy, alludes to the dual nature of her technique. Or perhaps it speaks to the dichotomous nature of the work with that of her late husband, Pollock. The explosive quality of Dichotomy vividly projects her turmoil and inner rage stemmed partly from her tempestuous relationship with Pollock, while simultaneously evoking his painterly gesture and emphasis on opticality, indexicality and totality.