- 384
A George III English Carpet, in the manner of Robert Adam, Axminster or Moorfields, circa 1780
Description
- wool pile
- Approximately 470cm. by 433cm; 15ft. 5in., 14ft. 2in.
Provenance
Phillips of Hitchin, Hertfordshire
Marcel Esnaulst, Château-sur-Creuse, Aubusson
Sotheby's, New York, December 1993, lot 253; Property approved for deaccession by Boscobel Restoration, Inc., Garrison on the Hudson, New York
Literature
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Since we are not professional conservators or restorers, we urge you to consult with a restorer or conservator of your choice who will be better able to provide a detailed, professional report. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
All four carpets cited, together with the present example, exhibit the same pattern of a central roundel with a radiating acanthus within a pale circular frame where a lush floral garland interlaces with a delicate sheaf, in turn flanked by baskets issuing bouquets at the corners spaced by rose sprays. This combination of classical motifs with a naturalistic rendering of flowers is typical of the designs for which Robert Adam was famously recognised.
Thomas Moore of Chiswell Street, in the Moorfields, London (1752) and Thomas Whitty of Axminster (1755) were the major carpet workshops in England during the second half of the 18th century and both produced carpets from designs by the Adam Brothers. Whether or not the present carpet and cited examples were woven at Moorfields or Axminster remains uncertain. The Metropolitan Museum of Art attributes its carpet to `probably Axminster' (see Standen, Edith Appleton, `A Light and Elegant Ornament', Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol.16, March 1958, pp.204-207), and the Philadelphia Museum of Art attributes it's to Moorfields. Thomas Moore and Robert Adam were friends and therefore Adam often referred clients to Moorfields for the manufacture of carpets from his designs. The carpets woven at Moorfields were of a finer weave and thus more time consuming and more expensive than those woven at Axminster (see Jacobs, op.cit.pg.30). It appears that the Axminster workshop was more prolific, undoubtedly receiving more commissions due to their lower cost. It was also more typical of Axminster to produce more than one carpet from the same design if it found favour with patrons. That there are five known examples of the present design may suggest that these carpets were woven at Axminster. However, considering that Robert Adam was closer to Thomas Moore, all of these carpets could have been manufactured at Moorfields. As there is a lack of documentation from the period, it is not possible to attribute these carpets more specifically.
English carpets from the 18th century rarely appear on the market, and the carpet offered here remains a true reflection of the elegance favoured by Adam and his contemporaries.