- 365
A pair of George III rosewood, harewood, mahogany and satinwood marquetry commodes circa 1770
Description
- MAHOGANY ROSEWOOD SYCAMORE BEECH SATINBIRCH
- 89cm. high, 138cm. wide, 69cm. deep; 2ft. 11in., 4ft. 6½in., 2ft. 3in.
Condition
"In response to your inquiry, we are pleased to provide you with a general report of the condition of the property described above. Please note that colour, clarity and weight of gemstones are statements of opinion only and not statements of fact by Sotheby's. We do not guarantee, and are not responsible for any certificate from a gemological laboratory that may accompany the property. We do not guarantee that watches are in working order. Prospective buyers should inspect each lot to satisfy themselves as to condition and must understand that any statement made by Sotheby's is merely a subjective, qualified opinion. Prospective buyers should also refer to refer to any Important Notices regarding this sale, which are printed in the Sale Catalogue, in particular to the Notice regarding the treatment and condition of gemstones and to the Notice regarding import of Burmese jadeite and rubies into the US.
NOTWITHSTANDING THIS REPORT OR ANY DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING A LOT, ALL LOTS ARE OFFERED AND SOLD "AS IS" IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS PRINTED IN THE SALE CATALOGUE."
Catalogue Note
The present commodes can be said to be in a transitional style which is typical of Cobb`s work. The form shows both a strong French influence in the serpentine outline and in the style of some of the inlay but also shows neo-Classical influences as evidenced by the urn motif to the top and front styles and also the leaf-carved supports.
Very little is known of the early life of the Royal cabinet-maker John Cobb ( circa 1715-1778), until he entered into partnership with the elder William Vile in 1751. Shortly after this, on 31st May 1755, he married Sukey Grendey and became the son-in-law of the celebrated cabinet-maker Giles Grendey. Cobb continued in business for thirteen years after Vile`s retirement in 1764, during which time he produced the documented inlaid commode and two pedestals for Paul Methuen ( 1772) which have become seminal to the construction of his identity as a producer of high quality furniture often incorporating a variety of exotic timbers ( cf. Anon., Corsham Court, 1993, p.11, fig.111).
The present commodes also have affinities with furniture known to have been supplied by the prominent firm of London cabinet-makers, Mayhew and Ince, (a partnership which flourished between 1758 and 1804), suggesting that this firm may have also supplied them.
It is noted that in the Dictionary of English Furniture Makers that amongst `the diverse forms' of furniture produced by Mayhew and Ince was the `highly proficient and adventurous use of marquetry, distinguished by a variety of techniques and pointing to a significant number of specialist marqueteurs in the firm`s employ,' continuing that their work was distinguished by the use of `large scale Antique motifs.. derived from engravings, simply coloured and boldly inlaid on a contrasting ground; extensive and delicate surface engraving to achieve the illusion of depth; and subtle inlaying ( usually of foliate designs), differentiated from the ground wood only by the natural colour and figure of the inlay'.
Clearly neo-classical inlay deriving from the Antique can be seen in the present commodes but more specifically the inlaid urns on the stiles of the present commode can be closely compared with a commode attributed to Mayhew and Ince, illustrated in Lucy Wood, op. cit. p. 203. A similar motif also appears on a commode designed by Robert Adam for Lord Derby and supplied by Mayhew & Ince in 1775, again illustrated, Lucy Wood, op. cit. p.207. It is interesting also to note that the form of the commode with doors to each end enclosing shelves and drawers compares with another commode of the same form, also attributed to Mayhew and Ince, probably supplied to Archibald Douglas ( later 1st Baron Douglas) at 104 Pall Mall, London, circa 1773 and illustrated Lucy Wood, op. cit., pp 195-197.